Having a baby is a big task , and as such , it issue forth with a whole set of responsibilities and forfeit . That in itself may not be surprising news show – but what you might not have realized is that many of them actually begin well before your diminutive half - clone ever sees the twinkle of day . From the moment you see that supererogatory line on the maternity test , your life is beholden to an ever - changing list ofthings you ca n’t do , thing youshouldn’t do , and thingsyou’ve never done beforebut are now told youmust perfectly not forgetto doon a daily basis .

Now , some of those forbiddance are easier than others – after all , there ca n’t be that many people out there living off an all - shark dieting . But others can be more troublesome . Studies have suggestedfor yr nowthat caffeine – that break up - me - up bank on byabout four - fifth of Americansto get them alive and alert each sunrise – is not good in any amount during pregnancy , with its consumption link up to mellow rates of abortion , miscarriage , low birth system of weights , and childhood ague leukemia .

compare to those outcomes , being a mo short might not seem so bad – but this is the termination that has most latterly made headlines . In a paper bring out just yesterday , researchers found that nipper exposed to caffein and caffein metabolite in the uterus were up to 2 centimetre ( 0.8 inches ) shorter at ages four and eight than their compeer without such a story .

And we ’re not talking about parent mainline espresso solar day and night here : the correlativity was manifest “ even with enate consumption below current recommendations of 200 mg twenty-four hour period , ” the authors write . That ’s the equivalent of about one cup of coffee all day – an amount which , under normal fortune , would barely record , but which the research worker found was comparable to a smoking habit in terms of reduced elevation in puerility .

So , is it time to outlaw caffeine during gestation , thus avoiding a fearful future in which everybody is slightly less than an inch shorter than they might otherwise be ? Well , have ’s not be too hasty :

“ This type of study is somewhat controversial since it can only shew an association , not causation , ” show out Alex Polyakov , a Clinical Associate Professor at the Faculty of Medicine , Dentistry and Health Sciences at the University of Melbourne , and Consultant Obstetrician , Gynecologist and Fertility Specialist at Melbourne IVF and the Royal Women ’s Hospital , Melbourne , in astatementfor the Australian Science Media Centre .

It ’s an inescapable problem with studies like these , but randomized trial , which may really stand some chance of try a causal effect , simply are n’t ethical when it comes to exhibit baby to potentially hazardous substances . The best researchers can do is a retrospective study , where they compare outcomes from pre - existing datasets and endeavor to find a connection between them .

“ The fundamental supposal is that women who consume less coffee are identical in all respects to women who consume more , and authors go to great duration to control that this is the case by using quite advanced statistical technique , ” Polyakov , who was not involved in the study , impart . “ Unfortunately , this ‘ singular difference ’ can not ever be whole achieved . ”

That ’s why this particular study is seeing something of a pushback from some academics . “ [ The ] termination that ‘ increase levels ’ of caffein and paraxanthine , even in low amounts , was associated with shorter stature in other puerility is incorrect , ” gloss Gavin Pereira , a Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Curtin University .

“ This finale indirectly imply that as their consumption of caffeine increment , peril of poor stature also increases , ” he explained . “ Rather , all that can be concluded from this written report is that the children bear to women who down higher levels of caffeine were shorter than the children carry to women who consumed comparatively lower storey of caffeine . ”

And there are many possible reasons why that might be the pillow slip . Perhaps the investigator are correct , and it really is that caffeine photo in the uterus handicap growth later on in childhood – but then again , it may be that working longer hours during pregnancy leads a person to both drink more caffein and also experience more stress . Perhaps it’sstress levels during pregnancy , and not caffeine , which is responsible for the light height in their child .

instead , maybe having a higher caffein intake is a symptom of having a poor diet ; in that case , perhapsmalnutrition is playing a partin the offspring ’s height after birth . Heck , perhaps it ’s just that scant people need more caffeine in the daytime to make up for all the surplus energy we expend reaching up high up for things that have been placed slenderly out of reaching – the point is the study did not , and indeed could not , account for any of these possibilities . We just do n’t know .

But that does n’t mean the study should be disregard completely . “ We already love from previous research that there is a link between mellow caffein consumption ( > 300 mg a day ) and lower birthweight and preterm nascence , and intakes of more than 350 magnesium a day are associated with gestation release ( miscarriage and stillbirth ) , ” commented Helena Gibson - Moore , a nutrition scientist at the British Nutrition Foundation , in a affirmation for theUK ’s Science Media Centre .

And while the bailiwick fall myopic of proving a causal relationship , Gibson - Moore pointed out that “ the tie between maternal caffeine uptake and decreased child height , is biologically plausible turn over that caffein and paraxanthine cross the placenta . ”

Essentially , this study belike should n’t send you into a scare if you ’re currently or of late fraught and partial to a cup of joe now and then – but it ’s a utilitarian admonisher that caffeine , the most widely used psychoactive substance in the world , is something that does n’t carryzerorisk to the developing foetus .

That enunciate , there are very few things out there that do . Even paracetamol , sometimes know as acetaminophen , has beendowngraded recently , moving from “ one of the only analgesic useable to significant people ” to “ might be linked to neurologic disorder , language delays , minify I.Q. , and more . ”

Overall , Polyakov advise , “ a healthy balanced dieting is the best possible strategy . ” A small amount of coffee during gestation , he suppose , is “ rather unlikely to result in significant trauma to either a pregnant soul , or the issue , notwithstanding the findings of this work ” – and indeed , reading too far into the results of studies like this may actually do more harm than safe .

“ Advice to unnecessarily restrict pregnant women ’s dieting may in fact be counterproductive and make anxiety and the feeling of guilt should charwoman not be able to adhere to them , ” Polyakov pronounce . “ The bottom line is that if one ’s wellbeing is enhance by have a cup of deep brown , there is most likely no harm in have it . "

The report was published inJAMA connection Open .

All “ explainer ” articles are substantiate by fact checkers to be right at time of publication . Text , images , and link may be edit , removed , or added to at a former particular date to keep info current .