Chelsea Manning ’s legal team went into damage - command mode Thursday after a headline by theDaily Beastsuggested that prosecutors had accuse her of lying or erroneously yield false testimony during her 2013 court - martial .
abduce an unsealedcourt filing , the Beast reported that prosecutors believe Manning may have give “ false or false testimony ” when recounting the events hem in her 2010 revealing of classified cloth to the anti - secrecy organization WikiLeaks .
A former U.S. Army intelligence analyst , Manning did not show during her court - warlike but did address the Ft . Meade military lawcourt regarding her motives for leaking some 700,000 classified documents , sayingshe stand for to “ trip a domestic debate on the role of the military ” and U.S. strange insurance policy in universal “ as it related to Iraq and Afghanistan . ”
man was arrested and confined earlier this calendar month after being held in contempt for refusing to answer query before a Union grand panel in the Eastern District of Virginia .
In a motion lodge on March 1 , her effectual team posit that during “ preliminary discussions , the prosecution indicate that they had grounds to trust that Ms. Manning may have made statements discrepant with her anterior testimony . ”
“ At most , we know that the princely jury likely relate to the 2010 disclosures , and related people and organizations , ” the attorneys write . “ And despite repeated asking by Ms. Manning ’s legal team for information about the nature of the require grand panel questions , the public prosecutor has only by and large revealed that he believes some of Ms. Manning ’s statements at the court - martial were either false or mistaken , and that the grand jury would benefit from get word more details about Ms. Manning ’s tangency and communications with respect to the 2010 disclosures . ”
A spokesperson for Manning supply a affirmation follow the Beast ’s report , clarifying : “ At no head in the Court ’s record have prosecutors accused Chelsea Manning of provide ‘ assumed or shoddy ’ testimony . headline indicating otherwise are deceptive . ” The allegation , in other password , had not been heard by the judge until it was raise by her attorney .
It ’s not uncommon for defense attorneys to preemptively refute allegations made by prosecutors outside of the courtroom . ( Doing so is unremarkably a sign the defense believe the accusation can be easy shot down , damage the prosecution ’s credibleness . ) It is also not rare for newsworthiness mercantile establishment to publish tale found on what one side of a case claim the other has said privately .
The motion stated that she ’s experienced “ all manner of intrusive surveillance ” since her sack from prison house in 2017 , including “ surveillance vans parked outside her flat , federal agent following her , and stranger attempting to goad her into an absurdly throw conversation about sell dual - use engineering science to foreign actors . ”
Manning has state that her refusal to testify in the case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is anact of protestagainst the exercise of distinguished juries in general .
“ I will not take part in a secret cognitive operation that I morally object to , particularly one that has been historically used to entrap and persecute activists for protected political speech , ” she said .
Chelsea ManningJulian AssangeWikiLeaks
Daily Newsletter
Get the well technical school , science , and civilisation news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , deliver to your present .
You May Also Like
